Editing life : CRISPR et la bioéthique (Tle)
Fiche à imprimer : le cours, les trois exercices et le corrigé (sur une page à part). Revenir au cours en ligne
| Anglais | Français |
|---|---|
| gene editing | l'édition génétique |
| DNA | l'ADN |
| to cure a genetic disease | guérir une maladie génétique |
| designer babies | les bébés « sur mesure » |
| bioethics | la bioéthique |
| He shouldn't have edited the embryos. | Il n'aurait pas dû modifier les embryons. |
CRISPR-Cas9 est un outil qui permet de couper et modifier l'ADN avec précision, comme des « ciseaux génétiques ». Emmanuelle Charpentier et Jennifer Doudna ont reçu le prix Nobel de chimie 2020 pour l'avoir développé. En 2023, le Royaume-Uni a été le premier pays à autoriser une thérapie fondée sur CRISPR contre la drépanocytose. Mais en 2018, un chercheur chinois a modifié des embryons humains, provoquant un scandale mondial et une peine de prison. Pour juger le passé : should have / shouldn't have / could have + participe passé.
Mise en situation : le cours de SVT en anglais
À retenir
- DNA, a gene, an embryo, gene editing, a genetic disease, a treatment, designer babies, bioethics, long-term effects.
- should have / shouldn't have / could have + participe passé ; draw the line ; was approved (passif).
Exercice 1 : CRISPR et la bioéthique : exercice 1 (QCM)
- « l'ADN »
- DNA
- AND
- NDA
- « l'édition génétique »
- genes edition
- gene editor of
- gene editing
- Prix Nobel de chimie pour CRISPR :
- 2020
- 2000
- 1990
- « Il n'aurait pas dû le faire. »
- He shouldn't have did it.
- He shouldn't have done it.
- He shouldn't do it yesterday.
- « Il aurait pu attendre. »
- He could have waited.
- He could waited.
- He can have waited.
- « la drépanocytose »
- sick cell disease
- circle cell disease
- sickle cell disease
- Premier pays à autoriser une thérapie CRISPR (2023) :
- le Brésil
- la France
- le Royaume-Uni
- « les bébés sur mesure »
- design baby of
- designed babys
- designer babies
- « tracer la limite »
- to drawn the line
- to draw the lane
- to draw the line
- « les effets à long terme »
- long-time affects
- long-term effects
- long-terms effect
Exercice 2 : CRISPR et la bioéthique : exercice 2 (à compléter)
- He shouldn't .......................... edited the embryos.
- He could have .......................... for international rules. (wait)
- CRISPR can cut DNA like .......................... .
- A treatment was .......................... in the UK in 2023.
- Nobody knew the long-term .......................... .
- Where should we draw the .......................... ?
- to cure genetic ..........................
- People fear designer .......................... .
- They should have .......................... for permission. (ask)
- between healing and ..........................
Exercice 3 : CRISPR et la bioéthique : mise en situation
- À quoi pourrait-il servir ?
- What could it be use for?
- For what could it used?
- What could it be used for?
- Un traitement a été autorisé en 2023.
- In 2023, a CRISPR treatment has been approved in the UK.
- In 2023, a CRISPR treatment was approved in the UK.
- In 2023, a CRISPR treatment approved in the UK.
- Que s'est-il passé en Chine ?
- What happened in China in 2018?
- What has happened in China in 2018?
- What did happen in China in 2018 of?
- Il n'aurait pas dû le faire.
- He hasn't should do it.
- He shouldn't have did it.
- He shouldn't have done it.
- Personne ne connaissait les effets à long terme.
- Nobody knew the long-term affects.
- Nobody knew the long-term effects.
- Nobody knowed the long-term effects.
- Il aurait pu attendre.
- He could have waited for international rules.
- He could waited for international rules.
- He can have waited for international rules.
- Les gens craignent les bébés sur mesure.
- People fear designer babies.
- People fear designed babys.
- People fears designer babies.
- Où tracer la limite ?
- Where should we drawn the line?
- Where we should draw the line?
- Where should we draw the line?
- Les scientifiques auraient dû consulter le public.
- Scientists should consulted the public.
- Scientists should have consulted the public.
- Scientists should have consult the public.
- Soigner, oui ; améliorer, c'est plus discutable.
- Healing, yes; enhancing is most debatable.
- Healing, yes; enhancing is more debatable.
- Heal, yes; enhance is more debating.
Corrigé
Exercice 1
1. a) DNA · 2. c) gene editing · 3. a) 2020 · 4. b) He shouldn't have done it. · 5. a) He could have waited. · 6. c) sickle cell disease · 7. c) le Royaume-Uni · 8. c) designer babies · 9. c) to draw the line · 10. b) long-term effects
Exercice 2
1. have · 2. waited · 3. scissors · 4. approved · 5. effects · 6. line · 7. diseases · 8. babies · 9. asked · 10. enhancing
Exercice 3
1. c) What could it be used for? · 2. b) In 2023, a CRISPR treatment was approved in the UK. · 3. a) What happened in China in 2018? · 4. c) He shouldn't have done it. · 5. b) Nobody knew the long-term effects. · 6. a) He could have waited for international rules. · 7. a) People fear designer babies. · 8. c) Where should we draw the line? · 9. b) Scientists should have consulted the public. · 10. b) Healing, yes; enhancing is more debatable.